I am on a vibe that is sort of Kant's
"thing in itself".
(Kant's thing in itself means that you can't know
reality itself, but see reflections of it. For my
porpoises it is like the Allegory of the Cave.)
Anyways my value add is the the thing itself
is defined by ALL of the systems that interact with it.
Which does make it a little more tractable.
Like my go to example is a website that uses
a database. The site is defined as the space between
the site programming and the database programming.
There is no code that represents the greater system.
The actual system. Any code you look at will be
at most communicating with another system.
The "thing itself" is the system between the systems.
This is how a generalist can sometimes have deeper
knowledge. Their skill is in working across systems.
In my framing that "across systems" IS the deeper system.
I don't believe in ghosts per say, but I do believe that
in a very real sense a person lives on in the memory
banks of others. So distinction w/o a difference that IS
a ghost basically.
I am sure if I read more I'd find that this isn't a new
idea. I have seen notions of how reality is seen
as relational, which is very close to how I see it.
Like when you got to the store and buy something
the transaction is more real than you or the store.
Things like "you" and a "store" are made up
of all kinds of interactions with other systems.
These interactions are where the juice is.
#philosophy