It occurs to me that my most recent solution to the correlation of the Bell test has a weakness. In particular, it requires an assumption about "statistical equivalence" of circumstances that I would rather not make.
The Tumblr version seems correct but unclear that "horizontal" and "vertical" represent arbitrary directions.
Note nothing has changed. For instance, if you use probability theory to predict the detections of a Bell test, you get the same result as QM.
Edited 152d ago