fraudulant

175d

➿ AUDIO: HUSH 👙 MONEY SENTENCING 👨‍⚖️

#CONVICTED OF #SEXUAL_IMMORALITY & CHARGED with 34 #FRAUDULANT #FELONIES..🚔

👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙👙

Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case after a symbolic – and historic and unprecedented – hearing following the first felony conviction of a former and soon-to-be sitting president. Jan 10, 2025.

Transcript

0:00
Let's impose sentence, please,
0:03
Donald Trump,
0:03
you are before the court for sentence,
0:05
calling your conviction by trial
0:07
to 34 counts
0:08
of falsifying business records
0:10
in the first degree
0:11
before being sentenced.
0:12
The court will allow you,
0:14
your attorney,
0:14
and the assistant
0:15
district attorney and opportunity
0:17
to address the court
0:18
with any matters relevant to sentencing
0:20
or the people.
0:22
Thank you.
0:23
That where's the preferred place
0:25
for me to stand?
0:26
Where do you feel comfortable?
0:30
The defendant
0:31
in this case,
0:32
as you know, stands convicted of 34
0:34
counts of falsifying
0:35
business records in the first degree
0:37
or class D felonies.
0:40
Each carries
0:41
a range of authorized
0:42
sentencing options
0:43
from is
0:44
for as much as one in the third
0:46
to four years
0:47
in state prison,
0:48
to a variety of non
0:49
incarcerated sentences.
0:51
In this court's January 3rd decision
0:54
on the defendants
0:55
Clayton motion, Your Honor
0:56
indicated an inclination
0:58
to impose an unconditional discharge
1:01
under all the circumstances of this case,
1:04
its unique posture,
1:05
and the defendant's
1:05
status as president elect.
1:08
The people recommend the sentence
1:10
of an unconditional discharge
1:13
in finding the defendant guilty.
1:14
In this case,
1:15
the jury necessarily found unanimously
1:19
that the defendant falsified
1:20
34 separate entries
1:22
in his business records
1:24
with the intent to defraud,
1:25
which included an intent
1:27
to commit or conceal a conspiracy
1:30
to promote his own election
1:32
by unlawful means.
1:35
Having presided over a trial,
1:37
Your Honor is very familiar
1:39
with the conduct, its seriousness
1:41
and the overwhelming evidence
1:43
to support the jury's verdict.
1:45
I'm certainly not going to rehash
1:46
that now.
1:48
In last week's decision on January 3rd,
1:50
this court referred to the provision
1:53
of the defendant's
1:53
conduct, his criminal conduct
1:56
in this case,
1:57
as constituted in, quote, premeditated
2:00
and continuous deception.
2:03
The verdict was delivered by a jury
2:05
that was carefully chosen
2:07
using extensive questionnaire
2:10
based on suggestions from both parties
2:12
and after thorough
2:13
questioning of the prospective
2:15
jurors by both sides.
2:18
The verdict
2:18
in this case was unanimous and decisive,
2:22
and it must be respected,
2:24
as this court has observed, quote,
2:27
the sanctity of a jury verdict
2:29
and the deference
2:30
that must be accorded to
2:32
it is a bedrock principle in our nation's
2:35
jurisprudence.
2:39
The defendant's conduct before, during,
2:41
and after
2:42
this trial also merits consideration.
2:46
Instead of preserving, protecting,
2:48
and defending our constitutionally
2:50
established system of criminal justice,
2:53
the defendant,
2:55
once and future
2:56
president of the United States,
2:58
has engaged
2:59
in a coordinated campaign
3:00
to undermine its legitimacy.
3:04
Far from expressing any kind of remorse
3:07
for its criminal conduct,
3:09
the defendant has purposefully
3:10
bred disdain
3:12
for our judicial institutions
3:15
and the rule of law.
3:17
And he's done this to serve his own ends
3:20
and to encourage others to reject
3:22
the jury verdict
3:23
that he finds so distasteful.
3:27
He is characterize these proceedings
3:29
as corrupt, rigged, a witch hunt,
3:33
or a sham too many times to tabulate.
3:37
The defendants
3:37
rhetoric has only ratcheted up
3:39
since this
3:40
court's rulings
3:41
on his motions to dismiss,
3:44
he has been unrelenting
3:45
in his unsubstantiated attacks
3:48
upon this court and its families,
3:50
individual prosecutors
3:52
and their families,
3:53
the witnesses, the grand jury,
3:55
the trial jury,
3:57
and the justice system as a whole.
4:01
The defendant has not only been held
4:02
in contempt
4:03
by other juries and other matters,
4:06
but this court alone
4:07
found the defendant
4:08
in contempt for ten distinct violations
4:11
of the order
4:11
restricting extrajudicial speech.
4:15
In his legal filings,
4:17
the defendant has used dangerous rhetoric
4:19
and leveling
4:20
accusations of intentionally unlawful
4:24
and unconstitutional conduct
4:26
on the part of this court
4:27
and the prosecution.
4:30
As this
4:31
court has noted,
4:32
the defendant's conduct, quote,
4:34
constitutes a direct attack
4:36
on the rule of law itself.
4:40
Moreover,
4:41
the defendant has publicly threatened
4:43
to retaliate against the prosecutors
4:46
who have sought to hold him accountable
4:48
in this and other matters,
4:50
and the courts,
4:51
who have endeavored
4:52
to fairly and faithfully adjudicate
4:55
these matters.
4:57
Such threats are designed
4:59
to have a chilling effect
5:01
to intimidate those
5:03
who have the responsible ability
5:05
to enforce our laws,
5:07
in the hopes
5:09
that they will ignore the defendant's..