Rated The Time Machine 6/10
Facinating for when it was written, but felt like it was sort of missing a _story_.<br/><br/>I'm definitely reading these older classics so that I acquaint myself with what I've assumed all my peers read when they were younger, so this eventually made its way into my reading list.<br/><br/>It's an incredible story given when it was written, late 1800s, and I can imagine it blowing minds at the time when it was read. The technicality of the book is interesting too, how there's a story inside of the story whereby the … character we're following (not narrator, but not really the protagonist) is sharing the experience with the reader. In fact, the majority of the book is a straight up monologue. Then to compound this, it's the Time Traveller (I guess the protagonist) in the present, sharing their past experience of living in the futre!<br/><br/>Timey wimey.<br/><br/>But I wasn't really expereiencing the technical feats, more following the story along, and that's where, for me, it was sort of lacking. There wasn't _really_ a story. In the sense that there were cause effect, struggles to overcome and character arcs.<br/><br/>The Time Traveller meets and partners with a woman in the story, but when she's taken by the Morlocks and he just… goes okay "then, I'm off.".<br/><br/>It's likely that I missed something in the story, but it didn't land so well for me. I think it's interesting, but I didn't come away thinking about the content of the story, the questions it could raise.<br/><br/>The very, _very_ end is bold, and I definitely appreciated that, but it really didn't add anything either.