How is saying it is a disservice constitute #Holocaust inversion? 🤡
The concept itself of "holocaust inversion" is ridicolous for the simple fact that it doesn't exist a parallel concepts for any other war crime in history. It can't be applied anywhere else, which shows that it is only used to shield Israel by otherwise obvious comparison.
It only serves the purpose of being able to randomly and illogically censor content to prevent otherwise well motivated critics to Israel.
The same goes with the censorship of comparison of Israel crimes and Nazist crimes: doesn't matter how similar the historycal context is, it will be censored.
While it won't be censored the comparison with fascism: even if proper fascism has very little similarity with what is currently happening in Palestine. Since it is a fact that Mussolini never tried to exterminate a part of the italian population before Hitler asked him to.
The other problem with the concept—one so obvious it often consequently remains unnoticed and/or unsaid in plain language—is this:
The questioning or assessment of Gaza against the Holocaust in any of its terrible dimensions or details (the type of analysis journalists and historians engage in daily) is not "Holocaust inversion." It is due diligence.
Holocaust inversion is doing much the same again, to the same ends, and declaring it good.